Discussion about this post

User's avatar
steve eyre's avatar

Hopefully when I go on BBC question time next week I will be able to ask my question “Is Ed miliband the most dangerous politician in government today?”

Expand full comment
Wibbling's avatar

Interesting that the median value is used rather than the mean as then our prices would even more egregious. If the outliers were removed (us) and then we compared to the mean we'd look even worse.

Does the price of gas include the necessary doubling in price to account for the 75 odd percent 'levy' added to it by government (which is then handed to the unreliables to make their costs appear reasonable)?

However the data is examined, it precludes any concept of growth - but then that's the point: the whole intent of the 'climate change' tax scam is ideological, not rational.

Reeves recently complained no one put forward alternatives to her plan. This isn't true. Countless people have, she just ignored them because they didn't suit her agenda. After all, cutting taxes and waste are not things the current state ever considers. The OBR specifically excludes such from it's calculations as they'd be the recommendation of every report in how to create growth.

I'm coming to realise that where we all thought Labour meant creating economic growth they really meant growth in taxes, waste, debt, unemployment and poverty. Same as we'll all be saving money on our energy bills not because energy is cheaper, but because it's unaffordable we don't use it, thus saving money!

Expand full comment
37 more comments...

No posts