Hi David, when you say "my primary motivation for this publication is to provide a public service to expose the fraud, lies and hypocrisy at the heart of the Net Zero project", is your view that net zero/decarbonising energy/everything is a bad aim? Or is it just the fraud, lies and hypocrisy - how it's being implemented - that is bad? Thanks, rod
I do my own stuff to camera and occasional media and podcast appearances. One of those is with Tom Nelson who was an early collaborator. Because he does it better, I just stick to making the content accurate and simply explained. His podcast offers a massive coverage across a range of relevant reality , supported with facts and physics of his guests, some very eminent, all who prefer understanding to belief.
You may find his experience of multi platform dissemination of the services you seem to be looking at of value. I'm sure he would talk to you if you asked him for advice on this, which he is more than capable of providing from experience of doing this in our field of climate and energy policy, and taking down the contrived deceit of grant funded "expert" pseudo scientists paid by politicians to create their legalised crime frauds in models that falsely claim to support the imposition of political ideology to end that reverses economic development in the West by its own soveraign laws, using policies they simply follow, by the civil servants standard ploy....... "because there is a treaty". So the almost wholly falsely based and totally economically regressive Agenda 21/30 policies handed down by the UN are put into law by sovereign governments, through their captured civil services, by the usual suspects, the worthless, university educated, practically incompetent, scions of wealthy middle-class elites who want to control what they never could, because they know what's good for us. So Tom covers the whole range of this legalised crime organisation.
Which is as David Rockefeller planned it when placing his protogée Maurice Strong into the UN as Deputy Secretary General, to focus their global Marxist politicians on his ideas to move global society to be ruled by the policies of their UNelected world government, in part by transferring power from the free people in Europe and the US to Asia, the same people who created the cheap energy fuelled technologies that create the wealth that is now freeing the developing nations from real and virtual slavery by elites, using cheap, scalable limitless energy, that we have transferred to the developing nations. Who now want to rule the World, and especially the people who enabled them and where the natural resources come from. The same nations, China in particular, where Strong fled to comfortable sanctuary when caught with $1M of UN funds sticking to his fingers, etc... all well known, rarely told. The Rio '92 UN Agenda 21 is now embedded in our legal system and that was Strong's work, and a group of well known Marxists in the the UN. Of which Guterres is the most recent and prominent.
AND, as with most political cover ups of major conspiracies and frauds that people who understand can see happening over decades, the lumpen proletariat in whose names this is done believe the wholly contrived bullshit through government funded propaganda in school, Universities and the MSM, and allow their nations' economies to be destroyed by these foreign actors in the name of massive and technically obvious/measurable lies to anyone truly competent to check them, as are you, regarding climate and absolute frauds regarding the realities of energy supply necessary to continue human development and the mass freedom the elites really don't want, because their control of wealth and freedom to do what they like is threatened by the will of the people to have a fairer share of the power, freedom and the wealth they have created. But that's another story... of reverse marxism and cognitive dissonce. Brian RL Catt www.deconfused.com @catandman
I listened to Farage's interview with Clive Moffat this evening: I've interacted with him over the years when he has responded to comments on articles he has written. I couldn't help thinking that Farage could do with a slightly more switched on, less rambling interlocutor.
Your articles are of course being even more widely syndicated. I've seen them at NALOPKT and thence at WUWT which brings them to international attention. They are also being linked and cited by commenters at sites with a much broader range of topic coverage such as Guido Fawkes and at least the less left wing parts of the national press.
I think the great value is that instead of being just another channel of political rants that assume the reader understands the underlying facts, you take the trouble to analyse the official data and the economic and physical realities and the inadequacies of the people behind the policies, and work brick by brick. That provides a secure foundation for people coming to their senses slowly, and one by one, as Charles Mackay observed.
The mainstream media no longer employs the sort of specialised journalists that it used to who had strong backgrounds in their subjects. A few have tried to remedy this by reading avidly but it's very hard to do without the background. Reading your work can be a big help to them, but achieving an MSM breakthrough under your own byline allows you to negotiate the priority subjects with editors. Incidentally, someone pointed out that the BBC have been fairly restrained in their reporting of the CFD auction: perhaps they know that they don't know, and will be exposed, thanks to the complaints they got from us recently.
Another important plank is striking right at the heart of the complex by providing well reasoned responses to consultations and calls for evidence from Select Committees, DESNZ, OFGEM, NESO etc. Drawing attention of sympathetic MPs to such efforts is also useful: this requires establishing contact in ways that go beyond email. Securing an invitation to talk to an APPG really helps, and so do any senior contacts that can be cultivated in the quangos. OFGEM is not a happy workplace.
Very positive developments with your substack. Hope it continues to go from strength to strength with the media addition. Your site is a valuable resource.
Hi David, when you say "my primary motivation for this publication is to provide a public service to expose the fraud, lies and hypocrisy at the heart of the Net Zero project", is your view that net zero/decarbonising energy/everything is a bad aim? Or is it just the fraud, lies and hypocrisy - how it's being implemented - that is bad? Thanks, rod
I do my own stuff to camera and occasional media and podcast appearances. One of those is with Tom Nelson who was an early collaborator. Because he does it better, I just stick to making the content accurate and simply explained. His podcast offers a massive coverage across a range of relevant reality , supported with facts and physics of his guests, some very eminent, all who prefer understanding to belief.
You may find his experience of multi platform dissemination of the services you seem to be looking at of value. I'm sure he would talk to you if you asked him for advice on this, which he is more than capable of providing from experience of doing this in our field of climate and energy policy, and taking down the contrived deceit of grant funded "expert" pseudo scientists paid by politicians to create their legalised crime frauds in models that falsely claim to support the imposition of political ideology to end that reverses economic development in the West by its own soveraign laws, using policies they simply follow, by the civil servants standard ploy....... "because there is a treaty". So the almost wholly falsely based and totally economically regressive Agenda 21/30 policies handed down by the UN are put into law by sovereign governments, through their captured civil services, by the usual suspects, the worthless, university educated, practically incompetent, scions of wealthy middle-class elites who want to control what they never could, because they know what's good for us. So Tom covers the whole range of this legalised crime organisation.
Which is as David Rockefeller planned it when placing his protogée Maurice Strong into the UN as Deputy Secretary General, to focus their global Marxist politicians on his ideas to move global society to be ruled by the policies of their UNelected world government, in part by transferring power from the free people in Europe and the US to Asia, the same people who created the cheap energy fuelled technologies that create the wealth that is now freeing the developing nations from real and virtual slavery by elites, using cheap, scalable limitless energy, that we have transferred to the developing nations. Who now want to rule the World, and especially the people who enabled them and where the natural resources come from. The same nations, China in particular, where Strong fled to comfortable sanctuary when caught with $1M of UN funds sticking to his fingers, etc... all well known, rarely told. The Rio '92 UN Agenda 21 is now embedded in our legal system and that was Strong's work, and a group of well known Marxists in the the UN. Of which Guterres is the most recent and prominent.
AND, as with most political cover ups of major conspiracies and frauds that people who understand can see happening over decades, the lumpen proletariat in whose names this is done believe the wholly contrived bullshit through government funded propaganda in school, Universities and the MSM, and allow their nations' economies to be destroyed by these foreign actors in the name of massive and technically obvious/measurable lies to anyone truly competent to check them, as are you, regarding climate and absolute frauds regarding the realities of energy supply necessary to continue human development and the mass freedom the elites really don't want, because their control of wealth and freedom to do what they like is threatened by the will of the people to have a fairer share of the power, freedom and the wealth they have created. But that's another story... of reverse marxism and cognitive dissonce. Brian RL Catt www.deconfused.com @catandman
I listened to Farage's interview with Clive Moffat this evening: I've interacted with him over the years when he has responded to comments on articles he has written. I couldn't help thinking that Farage could do with a slightly more switched on, less rambling interlocutor.
Your articles are of course being even more widely syndicated. I've seen them at NALOPKT and thence at WUWT which brings them to international attention. They are also being linked and cited by commenters at sites with a much broader range of topic coverage such as Guido Fawkes and at least the less left wing parts of the national press.
I think the great value is that instead of being just another channel of political rants that assume the reader understands the underlying facts, you take the trouble to analyse the official data and the economic and physical realities and the inadequacies of the people behind the policies, and work brick by brick. That provides a secure foundation for people coming to their senses slowly, and one by one, as Charles Mackay observed.
The mainstream media no longer employs the sort of specialised journalists that it used to who had strong backgrounds in their subjects. A few have tried to remedy this by reading avidly but it's very hard to do without the background. Reading your work can be a big help to them, but achieving an MSM breakthrough under your own byline allows you to negotiate the priority subjects with editors. Incidentally, someone pointed out that the BBC have been fairly restrained in their reporting of the CFD auction: perhaps they know that they don't know, and will be exposed, thanks to the complaints they got from us recently.
Another important plank is striking right at the heart of the complex by providing well reasoned responses to consultations and calls for evidence from Select Committees, DESNZ, OFGEM, NESO etc. Drawing attention of sympathetic MPs to such efforts is also useful: this requires establishing contact in ways that go beyond email. Securing an invitation to talk to an APPG really helps, and so do any senior contacts that can be cultivated in the quangos. OFGEM is not a happy workplace.
Very positive developments with your substack. Hope it continues to go from strength to strength with the media addition. Your site is a valuable resource.