Was the FIRES report a serious recommendation, or a realistic assessment of what would need to be done to achieve Net Zero?
Removing land from food production, stopping all food imports unless its comes via rail, plus net immigration is around 600,000+ a year, one has to ask what the Net Zero proponents suggest we eat if we can't grow it or import it? Each other? Grass and trees?
Yes, definitely anti-human and anti-life too!
Was the FIRES report a serious recommendation, or a realistic assessment of what would need to be done to achieve Net Zero?
Removing land from food production, stopping all food imports unless its comes via rail, plus net immigration is around 600,000+ a year, one has to ask what the Net Zero proponents suggest we eat if we can't grow it or import it? Each other? Grass and trees?