Drax Burning Magic Money Trees
Changes to strike and reference prices lead to record CfD subsidies overall and even more money for burning trees at Drax.
Introduction
The complete Contracts for Difference (CfDs) subsidy data for April have now been published by the LCCC and the results are clear. A record total of £268m in subsidies was paid to renewables generators in April 2024 as shown in Figure 1. Over £223m of these subsides went to offshore and onshore wind farms.
A large part of this was driven by indexing upwards of CfD strike prices and CfD contract being activated by Moray East and Hornsea 2 offshore wind farms as covered here last week. The subsides for dedicated biomass with CHP also ticked up. However, the biggest driver of the monthly increase in CfD payments was the increase in subsidies to biomass plants, and particularly Drax power plant in Selby.
CfD Strike Prices and ROC Values Indexed Upwards
As happens every April, the strike prices for Contracts for Difference (CfDs) have been indexed upwards (see Figure 2).
There are two biomass plants receiving subsidy through the CfD scheme. The strike price for Lynemouth was increased 4.3% to £145/MWh and the Drax strike price went up a similar percentage to £138/MWh.
Reference Prices Reduced
However, the increase in CfD strike prices is not the whole story. The Baseload Market Reference Price (BMRP) for biomass plants was reduced in this financial year, as shown in Figure 3.
The reference price for both Lynemouth and Drax was cut by more than half to just over £80/MWh. This is important because the subsidy received by the generators is calculated as the difference between the strike price and the reference price.
In addition, part of the Drax plant is subsidised through Renewables Obligation Certificates. The value of these certificates has increased by 9.7%, meaning Drax will now receive a certificate worth £64.73 for each MWh it generates, in addition to the market price it receives for its power.
Big Jump in CfD Subsidy per MWh
The increase in strike price, coupled with the reduction in reference price has resulted in a sizeable increase in the subsidies for burning trees. Figure 4 shows the average subsidy per MWh for both biomass plants has jumped from just over £7/MWh in March to nearly £60/MWh in April.
The total subsidy paid to biomass generators in April 2024 is over £34m, nearly five times more than the £7m received in total for January, February and March 2024 combined.
More Subsidy Leads to More Generation
This more generous subsidy regime has already had a substantial impact on the amount of electricity generated at Drax as shown in Figure 5.
We can see that generation (black line) was patchy during March as the subsidy per MWh was extremely low (blue bars). But when the subsidy went up at the beginning of April, generation increased almost immediately and has stayed high during the month.
Conclusions
It could be argued that it was “fair” to reduce the baseload reference price this year, because underlying fuel and electricity prices have fallen. However, a cynic might argue that it was important to incentivise Drax to generate more power, because our last remaining coal-fired power plant at Ratcliffe-on-Soar, near Nottingham is due to be closed later this year. We will need all the controllable, dispatchable power we can get to mitigate the impact of intermittent renewables.
The extra subsidies are unwelcome news for consumers, but Drax gets handsomely rewarded for burning what to it are magic money trees.
If you enjoyed this article, please share it with your family, friends and colleagues and sign up to receive more content.
Subsidies for burning wood imported from abroad must be the biggest madness of the UK’s energy policy.
With the uplift for recycle value ROCs are now worth over £70 each: I assume a 13% uplift as the average until there is better information. One of the Drax units has a ceiling on its ROCs per year, so it tends not to operate when the economics are less favourable.
Drax does sell ahead a significant chunk of its potential output into hedging markets at forward prices, but the economics of operations compare the margin that could be made by buying in alternative supply for the forward sales contracts from wind, gas etc. in the day ahead market while shutting down their own operations and saving on woodchips against carrying on operating with any ROC subsidy or CFD subsidy or tax. There may be some additional income from ancillary services as well.
The Baseload Market Reference Price is fixed for each summer and winter season, starting in April and October. It is based on average quotations for the season ahead baseload (i.e. even delivery over every hour of the six months) in the preceding six months. It doesn't reflect the basis of operational economics, but it does set the level of subsidy or tax that applies to any CFD unit output in conjunction with the prevailing strike price. Because of the lead time built into the BMRP it resulted in high levels of tax long after prices in day ahead markets had fallen back with the result that the CFD unit only operated in conditions of extreme market stress when spot prices were high enough to cover the cost of the tax and the cost of warming up the plant. Now there is a guaranteed subsidy over the summer, and likely next winter too seeing how low electricity prices are at present..
When the strike price and BMRP are close we get to see the real unsubsidised operation economics against day ahead prices in the use of the CFD units.