Regular readers might recall that back in April, I wrote an article rebutting a blatant piece of propaganda that appeared in an advertorial in the Guardian, paid for by the National Grid.
I complained to both the Guardian and the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and there is both good news and bad news to report.
The bad news is that the Guardian dismissed the complaint saying:
“Colleagues have been through the piece in light of your comments, and do not believe that there is a basis for amending the copy of the article.”
The good news is the ASA appear to have taken a dim view of the article. Their response noted that the article has now been removed from the Guardian’s website and they said:
“We have decided to resolve your complaint through the provision of advice to the advertiser. Therefore, we have explained the concerns raised to the advertiser and provided them with guidance on how to ensure that their advertising complies with the Codes both now and in future.”
It is not clear whether the withdrawal of the article is related to the “advice” they gave or whether it is merely a coincidence. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that renewables are an expensive source of power and false claims can no longer be made in the press.
I think we should chalk this up as some sort of victory.
If you enjoyed this brief article, please share it with your family, friends and colleagues and sign up to receive more content. This week’s usual article will be published tomorrow and is about Labour’s disastrous Great British Energy plans.
Well done! Your pieces are my go-to resource when I try to explain this issue
But strangely the page at the guardian website says this
“Sorry – the page you are looking for has been removed
This is because it was advertisement feature content that was published as part of a commercial deal and funded by an advertiser.
It is Guardian News and Media policy to take down paid-for content at the end of these deals.”