Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SmithFS's avatar

"When the fuel of a conventional LWR is spent it still contains around 90% of fissile material"

Correction. It is more like 97% fissile material. 1% of which is plutonium. The rest being almost all U-238, a bit of U-235 remains.

I would mention these reactors, from Copenhagen Atomics, 40MWe each, high temperature molten salt, fits inside a standard shipping container (just the reactor, alternators and steam generators are external) and runs on Spent Nuclear Fuel + Thorium.

Energy Future Unveiled! THORIUM Molten Salt Reactors, Copenhagen Atomics:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27IntvWo4mo

THORIUM: World's CHEAPEST Energy! [Science Unveiled]:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U434Sy9BGf8

And China is now operating a Thorium Molten Salt Test Reactor, a breeder, 2MWth.

Russia has been running their BN-800 sodium fast reactor since 2016 and their BN-600 since 1981 and is planning on building 3 BN-1200's and China is currently building 2 CFR-600 Sodium Fast reactors. One is already in operation. Russia is planning on closing the fuel cycle with BN-1200's on their PWR's and expect the BN-1200's to be lower cost than their LWR's.

India has already loaded fuel into its first Sodium Fast reactor and is also planning on closing their fuel cycle with their 500MWe fast reactors and PHWR-700 reactors eventually running on natural thorium. Their PHWR reactors are the lowest cost reactors in service Worldwide right now, under $2000/kw.

The US had a highly successful FBR program with the EBR-II, meant to develop the IFR. This was shutdown for the most obscene corrupt political reasons by sleazoids Bill Clinton & John Kerry. They even slapped a muzzle order on the scientists & engineers who worked on the project.

And speaking of actually advanced reactors, these can be built right now, CANDU EC6's running on the new ANEEL Thorium/HALEU fuel that are 7X more fuel efficient, produce very little plutonium, 7X less waste, refueled online, existing and fully operating supply chain, 96% Canadian produced. No need for a giant custom built pressure vessel. And CANDU's have run continuously for over 3yrs - 100% CF.

Canada's CANDU's produced 87.2 TWh in 2022 vs the giant James Bay hydro project which produces 83TWh/yr avg. With the total land area (including mining & fuel processing) of CANDU nuclear @ 20 sq. km vs James Bay hydro of 17,000 sq.km

Thorium + HALEU = Clean Core Thorium Energy: Mark Nelson @ TEAC11:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAUDuaqpVW8

And Terrestrial Energy's IMSR-400 is under Phase 2 CNSC review in Canada:

https://www.terrestrialenergy.com/technology/advantage/

"...IMSR cogeneration plants are efficient machines. The IMSR generates heat at high temperature (585 degree C steam). They have a thermal efficiency of 44%, a near 50% efficiency improvement. Conventional nuclear power plants use water as the reactor coolant and must operate at low temperatures...."

Expand full comment
Jon Engelberth's avatar

I'd also mention Kairos, the FLIBE molten salt/TRISO design that has been approved for construction (demo scale) by the NRC. It seems to be further along in the US approval process than any of the other molten salt designs.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts